How to resolve AdBlock issue? OPINION: Listen to voices of the unheard
- Details
- Published: Tuesday, 09 June 2020 13:05
Photo courtesy Renee Mandala
By Renee Mandala, Ellen Nightingale, Carol Castanon and Adrienne Hoskins
We are writing today in solidarity with the daughters, sons, brothers, sisters, grandparents, uncles and aunties who have lost loved ones because of institutional racism, oppression and violence. Secure Beginnings will not be silent during this critical time and denounces racism in all forms.
We stand for a vision where violence against communities of color ends, and we envision a world of healthy, resilient communities where black lives matter.
OP-ED on OVN OPINION page: Steve Colomé: 'Seeking truth in the age of COVID-19'
- Details
- Published: Friday, 05 June 2020 11:15
By Steve Colomé
“How much is your health worth, Ladies and Gents? One half-dollar is all it takes to cure all that ails you. That's right! This remedy will succeed where doctors have failed.”
Health order should not discriminate against Ojai businesses5-15 Op-Ed
- Details
- Published: Friday, 15 May 2020 11:46
By James Vega, Ojai city manager
On May 11, Ventura County officials stated that, under their most recent public health order, big-box stores can begin allowing customers in store to purchase any items. Previously, these stores were limited to only selling essential items. The order allowed other retail shops that had been closed under prior orders to open, but only for curbside pickup and delivery.
Don't scapegoat older adults by reopening carelessly
- Details
- Published: Friday, 08 May 2020 11:51
By Douglas Parker
The Ojai Valley News editorial on May 1, and a companion letter from Andrew Holguin, both urged a loosening of social-distancing and stay-at-home restrictions. Neither, however, specified just what is to be loosened and how. Those are the difficult questions. Various states across the country are experimenting with loosening such restrictions (and doing so with the encouragement of President Trump, even where their actions conflict with the guidelines of his own administration). At a time, when the death toll is projected to rise steadily over the next several weeks, it seems a particularly questionable moment to proceed with an extensive program of reopening.
OP-ED from Andrew R. Holguin on 5-1 OVN OPINION page: 'Inappropriate response to a pandemic'
- Details
- Published: Monday, 04 May 2020 13:05
By Andrew R. Holguin
Our response to the pandemic is being led essentially by physicians and health departments on a federal, state and local level, which, on its face, appears appropriate because the disease is serious, highly contagious and has significant health implications to, at most, a few percent of the population. These professionals are also best in understanding the disease and how to evaluate, manage and respond to it — health-wise.
April 24: OP-ED on OVN OPINION page: Dr. Jim Halverson: 'More information needed on COVID-19 antibody tests'
- Details
- Published: Friday, 24 April 2020 11:04
By Dr. Jim Halverson
It has been five weeks since Gov. Gavin Newsom's Stay At Home Order of March 20. There are still only seven reported cases in the Ojai Valley of COVID-19 and no deaths. On April 18, Ventura County Public Health Officer Dr. Robert Levin slightly eased the previous orders’ restrictions through May 15, as we have seen evidence of flattening of the curve. If we do see a significant increase in cases in Ventura County in the next several weeks, the requirements will again become stricter. Thanks for all of your continued outstanding efforts to follow all of the recommended Public Health guidelines.
Opinion column on April 3 OPINION PAGE: Now we really know why elections matter
- Details
- Published: Friday, 03 April 2020 11:31
By Bob Daddi
Who was alarmed to hear that New Orleans celebrated Mardi Gras this year, that megachurches still hold services, that 10,000 people crowed the docks in New York to view the hospital ship? Anyone surprised the farmers’ market was banned in Brentwood? Anyone?
Some people are behaving like moths attracted to and flying into the fire, whistling past the graveyard to show bravery or immortality. Ignorance really.
OP-ED in OVN on Feb. 28, 2020 OPINION PAGE: Ojai City Manager James Vega: City of Ojai response to county General Plan draft: ‘We are experiencing a climate emergency … and county government must do its fair share to deal with it’
- Details
- Published: Thursday, 27 February 2020 22:14
‘We strongly recommend that the Board of Supervisors exercise leadership on behalf of the citizens of the county and take a stand in these matters, and communicate with the county staff in the strongest manner possible the city of Ojai's opposition to what we consider to be the county staff's inappropriate attempt to use administrative maneuvers to subvert policies passed by duly elected officials — your Board of Supervisors.’
By James Vega, Ojai city manager
The Ojai City Council is very concerned about air pollution and the effects of climate change on our city and its residents. We are experiencing the drastic effects of climate change, as evidenced by the Thomas Fire, water shortages, and the persistent drought. We have adopted a climate emergency resolution and have created a Climate Emergency Mobilization Committee to make recommendations to council on actions the city can take to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and remove them from the atmosphere.
Accordingly, we are submitting the following comments.
OP-ED by John Brooks, president of CFROG: Taxpayers should not have to pick up the tab for fossil-fuel industry cleanup
- Details
- Published: Thursday, 20 February 2020 22:47
By John Brooks
None of us would walk out of a restaurant after eating a huge meal without paying and then expect others to clean up our mess. But that is what the state's oil companies are doing by abandoning wells and expecting taxpayers to pick up the cost.
Climate First: Replacing Oil and Gas (CFROG) was dismayed to learn that oil companies have given the state only $110 million to clean up onshore oil and gas wells when the estimated tab is closer to $6 billion.
Ventura River adjudication: Remembering the past
- Details
- Published: Friday, 14 February 2020 10:27
By Paul Jenkin, Friends of the Ventura River
The current controversy surrounding the adjudication of water rights to the Ventura River has focused on the most recent efforts by the city of Ventura to secure its water rights to the Ventura River. Many may not know that this effort has deep roots in the past.
The city of Ventura, was incorporated in 1886, but its claim to the waters of the Ventura River extend back to the establishment of Mission San Buenaventura in 1782. In addition to the Missions, the Spanish and Mexican governments also established a series of pueblos and ranchos between 1769 and 1835 in what later became the state of California.
California law recognizes water rights granted to pueblos under the Spanish and Mexican governments. Pueblo water rights are superior to all riparian and appropriative rights and cannot be forfeited by a failure to assert an interest or use of the water under that claim, including naturally occurring surface and subsurface water from the entire watershed of the stream flowing through the pueblo.
Despite the city of Ventura not being a successor to one of the eight original Spanish or Mexican pueblos, the city has periodically asserted its claim to the waters of the Ventura River based on a pueblo water-right.
In 1976, the city of Ventura attempted to assert a pueblo water right against the Casitas Municipal Water District’s right to divert water from the Ventura River at its Robles Diversion to Lake Casitas. The appropriative water rights granted to the Casitas Municipal Water District in the 1950s by the State Water Resources Control Board required Casitas to bypass the first 20 cubic feet per second of flow downstream of the Robles Diversion to protect the water rights of downstream water users, including the city of Ventura. The city claimed, however, that this provision did not fully protect its water rights under its pueblo water-rights claim.
California must get past differences on water
- Details
- Published: Friday, 14 February 2020 10:21
By Governor Gavin Newsom
Water is the lifeblood of our state. It sustains communities, wildlife and our economy—all of which make California the envy of the world.
Reliably securing this vital and limited resource into the future remains a challenge, especially with a warming and changing climate.
For more than a year, my administration has worked to find a comprehensive solution for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta—a path to immediately improve the health of these waterways, create certainty for the 35 million Californians who depend on these water sources, and maintain the economic vitality of the Central Valley.
Historically, disputes over water, or what some call “water wars,” have pitted stakeholders against one another: urban vs. rural; agriculture vs. conservation; North vs. South.
Today, my administration is proposing a path forward, one that will move past the old water binaries and set us up for a secure and prosperous water future.
Guided by science, this new framework will provide the foundation for binding voluntary agreements between government agencies and water users with partnership and oversight from environmental groups.